Friday, January 27, 2012

Watch this clip of a live CNN report following the attack on the pentagon on september 11?

http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/Cnn[1].P…





after watching this how can you believe anything the US government has told us about 911. No Airliner hit the pentagon so what did the government do to the hijacked planes????Watch this clip of a live CNN report following the attack on the pentagon on september 11?
Pitiful



I can only pray you wake up
Jamie McIntyre Is lying!

http://www.911myths.com/html/j…

Report Abuse

Watch this clip of a live CNN report following the attack on the pentagon on september 11?
The man just says that there are many small pieces but no large pieces. Many small pieces are what you'd expect, %26amp; he simply wasn't aware of the large pieces that were found.

Here are lots of photos of plane wreckage:



http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/con…

and

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technolo…

(scroll down after clicking).

=================

CLAIM: Explosions were reported in the WTC

FACT: Reports of explosions being heard are not true.



Quote: “NIST reviewed all of the interviews conducted by the FDNY of firefighters (500 interviews) and in addition conducted its own set of interviews with emergency responders and building occupants. Taken as a whole, the interviews did not support the contention that explosives played a role in the collapse of the WTC Towers.”



From Section F of http://www.911proof.com/NIST.pdf

========================

CLAIM: The hole the plane made in the Pentagon was too small.

FACT: The hole size was 90 feet across, which is almost a third of a football field!! Still, that’s somewhat smaller than the diameter of a 757.



This is explained by Professor Mere Sozen, a “Kettelhut Distinguished Professor Civil Engineering” at Perdue University.



Professor Sozen says that it’s the energy of the plane, not its size, that determines the size of the hole.



The plane is not a cartoon character that punches out its outline. Moving at 531 MPH it’s more fluid than solid, %26amp; this explains why you get the hole you got.



See how Prof Sozen used supercomputers to analyze the impact at:

http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/0209…

==================

CLAIM: No plane debris was found at Shanksville, PA



FACT: Large amounts of debris was found. Here are lots of photos of the debris:

http://911debunker.livejournal.com/7467.…

and

http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/P200061-…

The largest piece found was an engine fan.

====================

CLAIM: Osama Bin Laden is not wanted by FBI

FACT: Yes he is.

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/ter…

===================

CLAIM: The collapse of the twin towers %26amp; WTC 7 looked like a “controlled demolition”



FACT: Essentially all demolition experts say the collapse didn’t look like a “controlled demolition.” Moreover, the towers destroyed 7 nearby buildings--that’s not a “controlled demolition.”



Here’s an article from the world-renowned journal, “Implosion World” that makes mincemeat of the “controlled demolition theory” :



http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WT…

================================

CLAIM: The hijackers couldn’t have been able to fly the jets

FACT: Four hijackers were trained to fly planes, one per plane.



Mohamed Atta trained in Arizona from 1997 to 1999 %26amp; earned both a private pilot license and a commercial pilot license. He then trained on a Boeing 737 simulator,



The other three came to the US in 2000 %26amp; took 40 hours of training here %26amp; received private pilot’s licenses. They too enrolled in large-jet simulation training.



At least 2 of the hijacker pilots took training up %26amp; down the Hudson corridor, the pathway to the twin towers.



None of the 4 had to do the hardest things (take off, land, fly in bad whether). They simply had to aim at the largest structures in the world.



Here’s a photograph of one of the hijackers at pilot school:

http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/ch…



(Source: “Debunking 9/11, Pop Mech, page 4-5; the 9-11 Commission Report)

======================

CLAIM: Silverstein made “billions” in insurance on the collapses at WTC

FACT: Not true.



Yes, he was PAID $5 billion in insurance, but he had gigantic LOSSES that easily surpass that payment. To start with, he had to sue to get his money. This means lawyers fees (1/3 of the total) %26amp; tax (50% of the total BEFORE lawyers fees). This might leave him with $3 billion.



Next, Silverman could have made billions in rent if the WTC hadn’t been destroyed. Thus, he lost that profit when the attacks occurred. For example, he could have made $500 million/yr in rent. This comes out of the $3 billion.



Additionally, Silverstein IS committed to pay $102 million/yr in base rent, for the next 99 years, even though the towers %26amp; WTC7 were destroyed. Yes, this is true. Multiply 99 by $102 million and you get billions of dollars in expenses.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silve…



Then there are the massive costs of acquiring the WTC, outfitting them, advertising, security, paying companies that lost money, law suits, paying victims, etc, etc. Overall, he lost money on the collapse.

=========================

CLAIM: Some military leaders supposedly said that 9-11 was an inside job



FACTS: (1) No reference whatsoever is given, so it can’t be determined if these people are real. If they are real, how can we tell if they really said it?



(2) Even if they did say this, so what? Since only a handful of military people are quoted, I assume the other 100,000 military persons think that 9-11 was NOT an inside job. That’s a pretty impressive number of people against the conspiracy theory!Watch this clip of a live CNN report following the attack on the pentagon on september 11?
I would watch it, but my tinfoil hat is at the cleaners.
I can't watch the clip but I don't believe the US government and neither does one Japanese politician. Watch it here as he questions the 9/11 Commission's fairy tale.
Hate to break this to you, but I was stuck in traffic on I-395 North right next to the Pentagon and SAW the plane fly into it. The most horrifying sight I have ever seen...EDIT: That's pretty funny you would give me a thumbs down, I guess you are so hell-bent on 9/11 being a government conspiracy you just can't hear the truth...that's pretty sad my friend.
Only the most mindless followers of the propagandists still believe the official version of 9-11. The evidence of a U.S. government conspiracy is overwheliming.



Former LAPD dectective Mike Ruppert lays out the evidence implicating the U.S. government in the 9-11 conspiracy. Ruppert is a former L.A. detective who revealed a connection between the CIA and drug dealing in L.A. He is also the author of a book called Crossing the Rubicon -- which is available on Amazon.



Here's the video of Ruppert laying out the evidence that 9-11 was a U.S. government conspiracy in court-room fashion:



http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/261.htm…



------------------------------------



This article lays out the timeling surrounding 9-11.



A TIMELINE SURROUNDING SEPTEMBER 11TH - IF CIA AND THE GOVERNMENT WEREN'T INVOLVED IN THE SEPTEMBER 11 ATTACKS, WHAT WERE THEY DOING?



by Michael C. Ruppert



http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww…



--------------------------------------…



Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job

Man who set up Operation Gladio tells Italy's largest newspaper attacks were run by CIA, Mossad

Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet

Tuesday, December 4, 2007







Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.



http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/dec…



--------------------------------------…

Patriots Question 9-11



On this site you'll find a large list of people who question the official version of 9-11 and their reasons for doing so.



120+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials

290+ Engineers and Architects

60+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals

190+ Professors Question 9/11

200+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members

110+ Entertainment and Media Professionals

http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/profe…



--------------------------------------…



Loose Change



http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=…



What you'll see:



1) WTC towers collapse demolition style within an hour of being hit

2) Fireman called in saying only 2 lines would be needed to knock down the fires in the WTC building indicating a fire that is not out of control of raging at excessive temperatures.

3) Many explosions were reported in the WTC buildings

4) Building 7 came down demolition style without ever being hit by a plane and without sustaining significant damage.

5) Fires in all 3 buildings that collapsed were being suffocated as indicated by the dark smoke

6) Larry Silverstein, the new owner of the WTC buildings, who was fabulously enriched by the destruction of 9-11 admits on tape that he told them to "pull" building 7. "Pull" is a demolition term.

7) The hole in the Pentagon is much too small for a jet plane to have crashed there.

8) No plane wreckage, black box or other evidence of a plane wreck is found.

9) There is no evidence that a plane crashed at the supposed crash site in Pennsylvania. There is a reporter on film duly noting such on 9-11.

10) The bin Laden who is offered on tape claiming responsiblity for 9-11 is obviously not bin Laden at all. The FBI has not charged bin Laden with a crime stating that no evidence exists implicating him in the crime.

11) The supposed hijacker lacked the competence to fly the plane that hit the Pentagon in the virtually impossible maneuver required.

12) more . . .

No comments:

Post a Comment