Why did MSNBC and CNN try to hide Browns words from the people?

CNN did not show Browns speech live.



MSNBC showed about 2 mins of it then Olberman broke in and said some smart *** comment and starting talking over the speech interviewing people the speech was running in background without sound.Why did MSNBC and CNN try to hide Browns words from the people?
so they can let FOX shoot themselves in the foot
both biased "news" stations.Why did MSNBC and CNN try to hide Browns words from the people?
Why would anyone watch that channel? Try Fox News.Why did MSNBC and CNN try to hide Browns words from the people?
Olbermann is certifiable. On the next Countdown,Olb will be ranting from a room in Bellevue.
doesnt matter... OBIE and his 10 veiwers
Dont you know he thought it was the end of the world.
he addresses his ten viewers by name
First of all, this is not a referendum on Obama or Washington.



This is about local infighting in the Massachusetts Democratic Party, plain and simple.



In this particular race, there has been a great deal of conflict between the Democratic insiders in Western Mass and the Democratic insiders in Boston.



During the primary, Western Mass backed Martha Coakley (who is from Western Mass) because her primary opponent, Mike Capuano, a current U.S. House Rep from Somerville, was from Somerville not Western Mass.



According to my mom, the Western Mass Democrats got a lot more momentum in the primary because no one in Boston believed that Capuano could lose. Western Mass turned out, Boston and vicinity did not.



Mom says Capuano would probably have won easily had he not lost the primary (he never has a serious challenge when he runs for his House seat).



Coakley, on the other hand, not only dropped the ball as everyone knows, but no politicians in Boston wanted their names associated with her after she won the primary. My mom isn't high enough up the chain to know why this is (or maybe she is holding out on me because she doesn't want anyone to read this and recognize her dishing the inside scoop - she is old school and thinks she shouldn't be talking publicly about this).



As the race went on, she (mom) asked around as to why she hadn't been called out to phone bank, check lists of registered voters, etc, for the campaign as usual. She was told "we're not backing anyone" by "someone on the committee" (she is not telling me what committee because this blogging thing is making her uneasy).



Menino never backed her publicly ("Don't name names!" says mom. "Everyone knows he's the mayor!" I say). He never backed her secretly either, the machine was not turned out for Coakley.



"Nobody likes her" says mom. What she means is, Coakley had no friends in politics. The Democrats in Massachusetts let this happen because - "I don't know" says mom.



Maybe they weren't about to let Western Mass manipulate them. Maybe it all comes down to nothing more than who is friends with whom.



All Scott Brown did was see an opportunity and turn it to his advantage.



There is no deeper national implication. This is not a death knell for the Democratic party or Obama. This is a story of a domestic spat between "parochial divisions" in Massachsetts.



The proverbial house divided among itself, fell.
They did this because MSNBC and CNN are part of the Democrat propaganda machine. If you watched MSNBC last week, you would have seen people like Chris Matthews and Ed of the Ed show suggesting its time for Democrats to cheat in the Mass election. MSNBC and CNN have always been against republicans and favored the Democrats. This is why they cut Brown's speech and interrupted with Obama's teleprompter address.