WOW... Could CNN have picked a worse translator for Ahmedenijad? She SUCKS! (Larry King live)?

This is ridiculous. I know the corporate-elite are trying to dumb-down the Iranian president, make him sound bad, but I can't bear to listen to this chick.WOW... Could CNN have picked a worse translator for Ahmedenijad? She SUCKS! (Larry King live)?
Yes, someone who actually translated him fairly and accurate in a coherent fashion. She's perfect for their intended purpose. They don't want to make Ahmedenijad to come across as human. That makes it a lot harder to continue to portray him as the story book villain Americans love to hate like they did with Milosevic, Saddam Hussein and so on. She's perfect.



I've always denied and rejected claims Americans are too stupid or lazy and that's the cause of all of the US's problems as too simplistic and easy but if Americans are going to allow themselves to be lied into a war again this easily after the Iraq debacle I'm gonna have to rethink that hypothesis.



Iran totally denies any weapons plan and is fully within its rights to seek nuclear energy. I don't like the Iranian regime but I trust the word of the Iranian President over the lies of Washington every day.



They had proof of Iraq's WMD too and no matter what the Iraqi foreign minister said or how he denied the American media refused to take any of it serious. Even when Saddam offered to let the CIA in trough Tariq Aziz live on CNN Wolf Blitzer (sure it's coincidence he's former Aipac) didn't even blink nor did any of the American media heroes ever show that footage or any other where Iraqi officials deny the lies again and it's nearly impossible to find too. But I remember



Still why listen to the "evil" weird foreigners?

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/02/0鈥?/a>



"Aziz denied that Iraq now has any chemical or biological weapons, saying all were "obliterated in 1991." He said the United States remained unconvinced "of the facts," because to be convinced was in conflict with the U.S. policy of trying to topple Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. "

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/01/28/sprj.ir鈥?/a>



Who turned out to be right there?
I just tuned in and began, as usual, to laugh. The first comedy is Larry King doing the interview. Having Ahmedinijad answering Larry Kings questions is going to be anything but objective. This guy has been busy interviewing Travolta and Hefner a million times during the last 9 years of war.



Wow...what a joke this it. The translator is hooked on phonics. It is quite sad when it comes down to it that this type of propoganda is the only thing the semi-informed people actually get. The rest of us have absolutely no clue about anything going on to begin with and once they might be curious to know, they get this rubbish.



The Iranian pres. is not clever to say the least and he is doing his point of view more harm than good. He is baiting someone in office or in the media to discuss the Holocaust in a debate as to its implications on current Israeli policies. Instead of anyone 'proving' the Holocaust to him, what he wants is to trap a debate about Israeli actions against Palestinians. He knows full well about the Holocaust but no one in the media or government will participate in educating him because it would eventually involve implicating Israel itself. So we call him a stupid maniac before he forces us to show our own hypocrisy.



The worst of all is seeing Sarkozy and Brown, the dual Israeli citizens, alongside Obama barking away. Brown has brought the English to third world status and is a slave to the Bank of England. Sarkozy is walking a tight rope between anti-EU French majority and his masters over at the EU central Bank. Then we have the pied piper of globalization Obama who has absolutely no respect for the constitution or the sovereignty of this country. Seeing him try to talk tough about Iran is pathetic. He cannot even send 20,000 troops to Afghanistan but he is going to support an attack on a Nuke facility in the most holiest place of Shia muslims lol.



They are all full of it. They know very well that if a nuke ever went off it will be one provided by either Pakistan, Israel, or any of the other 5 permanent members. It will be blamed on Iran or whoever. I think they should try to see how stupid we all are and say they have found Bin Laden guarding the nuke facility in Iran as an excuse to attack! You know very well that 95% of us would not even scratch are heads....WOW... Could CNN have picked a worse translator for Ahmedenijad? She SUCKS! (Larry King live)?
To be fair, a lot of what Ahmedenijad says is actually gibberish. And I'm not so sure CNN provided the translator. She may be part of his entourage.



I listened to a rather hard-hitting interview with him this morning on NPR (Surprised? You shouldn't be.). He ducked, backtracked, contradicted, denied and outright lied.



Honestly, I'm amazed that the translator could even do her job. And I don't know how interviewer Steve Inskeep kept from ending the interview.WOW... Could CNN have picked a worse translator for Ahmedenijad? She SUCKS! (Larry King live)?
and you care what this idiot has to say ....why?
The Iranian president is a kook, the translator can only do so much given what she had to work with. She's just happy as hell she didn't have to do Gaddafii.